GROUP DISCUSSION: Setting up regional discussion areas

General Discussion Topic Archives
User avatar
1968Ranger
New Member
New Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: South Carolina
Contact:

re: GROUP DISCUSSION: Setting up regional discussion areas

Post by 1968Ranger »

Whats the old saying, "If you can make a difference in just one person's life."

I guess I succeeded.
:D
User avatar
heep70
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2039
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:03 pm
Location: Washington, Bonney Lake
Contact:

Re: re: GROUP DISCUSSION: Setting up regional discussion are

Post by heep70 »

1968Ranger wrote:I hate repeating myself, but I will until I am heard. :D

If everyone who reads this would go into their profile and EDIT their info on where they are and put the State in first, then you could sort the memberlist by location and at least get a general idea of who is where.

As it is now, if you sort by location, It just sorts it alphabetically.
Just my :2cents:



Yes, you got a point. Maybe they will see it now.
Greg

1971 F250 "Highboy". SOLD to "Highboy_Firefighter_71"
2000 Subaru Outback limited.
2000 F250 4X4 PSD SuperDuty Crew.
2010 Polaris 800RMK Dragon 155"
2013 Polaris Pro 800 RMK 163"
1980 Built Toyota "Trail Rig".
My last 1971 "Highboy" pics
User avatar
willowbilly3
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1591
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Black Hills

re: GROUP DISCUSSION: Setting up regional discussion areas

Post by willowbilly3 »

Good idea. As morganater said, don't forget Alaska. We have quite a few members there. They could maybe fit in with the Pacific NW crowd since Seattle is pretty familiar to anyone who has ever left the state.
Can I belong to 4 different groups? :lol: I have connections to at least three and Alaska would make 4 if it was a seperate group.
Great ideas have always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.
User avatar
1968Ranger
New Member
New Member
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2004 8:39 pm
Location: South Carolina
Contact:

re: GROUP DISCUSSION: Setting up regional discussion areas

Post by 1968Ranger »

Very Nice Keith.
mike
Post Reply