Another 67-72 difference found (door latch)

General Discussion Topic Archives
Post Reply
User avatar
FoMoCo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Ohio, Cincinnati

Another 67-72 difference found (door latch)

Post by FoMoCo »

I looked through Keith's two pages on identifing the differances and know of one he does not have. My 67 doors use the same catch mechanism for both sides. One of them is simply turned up-side-down. On my 70 doors, there is a distinct left and right catch(the thing in the door that cathes the strike post). The 67 doors, again, only have two lefts. Im not sure if this is a 67-69 thing. Ill try to post pics this weekend.

Nick Wilson
1969 F-100
2006 Fusion SEL
2006 e-320 cdi
2004 excursion V-10
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: Another 67-72 differance found (door latch)

Post by FORDification »

Are you serious? :lol: I don't think I've ever noticed that before. I'll be headed to the shop this evening after work to pick up some parts to get shipped, and I'll have to bring the camera to document that. My two '67 doors are leaning against the wall still completely assembled, so they'd be good candidates.

Good eye!.....and thanks for the heads up.

Just out of curiosity, how did you notice that? Were you reassembling some doors and trying to figure out which latch went into each side?
Last edited by FORDification on Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
NM5K
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 2:52 am
Location: Texas, Houston
Contact:

re: Another 67-72 differance found (door latch)

Post by NM5K »

Hummm...I looked on my 68, and they seem to be two different parts, if I'm understanding you right. IE: On mine, both sides have two bolts/screw on the bottom. Only one on the tops. So if it were the same part, seems to me, the bolt pattern would have to reverse. So I think on the 68, they were two different parts. MK
1968 F-250 / 300 six / T-18
Dana 60 - 4.10 Limited Slip
Kaylle
New Member
New Member
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 5:14 pm
Location: North Carolina, Monroe

re: Another 67-72 differance found (door latch)

Post by Kaylle »

I looked at my 67. The bolt pattern does reverse. Two bolts on the top drivers side. Two bolts on bottom passenger side. Don't know if it's common knowledge, but the window regulator from a 69 will bolt right into a 67. I know that for sure.
Kaylle Jonas
67 F100 SWB 429 C6
66 F100 SWB 390 Car 4spd Toploader 3.5 Traction Loc
65 F250 LWB 352 Granny 4spd
Monroe NC
User avatar
FoMoCo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Ohio, Cincinnati

re: Another 67-72 differance found (door latch)

Post by FoMoCo »

I had my 67 doors and 70 doors all leaning up against each other. I was trying to convert my 70 doors to 67 stlye. I counldnt figure out why the 67 latch was back wards?!? Finally, I looked at the doors. Ah-ha!

Nick
1969 F-100
2006 Fusion SEL
2006 e-320 cdi
2004 excursion V-10
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: Another 67-72 difference found (door latch)

Post by FORDification »

I took this shot yesterday in the shop, so everyone can get the visual. I'll be adding this to the ID page soon:

Image
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
User avatar
flyboy2610
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4901
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Nebraska, Lincoln

re: Another 67-72 difference found (door latch)

Post by flyboy2610 »

That was probably done as a cost cutting measure.
Why tool up to make two different parts when the same part will work two ways?
Corporate America..... :roll:
Post Reply